Wanderings of a Dragon
(Source: theamericankid, via theamazingsnood)
Don Mattrick comments on the Xbox One
…today I am announcing the following changes to Xbox One and how you can play, share, lend, and resell your games exactly as you do today on Xbox 360. Here is what that means
- An internet connection will not be required to play offline Xbox One games – After a one-time system set-up with a new Xbox One, you can play any disc based game without ever connecting online again. There is no 24 hour connection requirement & you can take your Xbox One anywhere you want & play your games, like on Xbox 360.
- Trade-in, lend, resell, gift, and rent disc based games just like you do today – There will be no limitations to using and sharing games, it will work just as it does today on Xbox 360.
- In addition to buying a disc from a retailer, you can also download games from Xbox Live on day of release. If you choose to download your games, you will be able to play them offline just like you do today. Xbox One games will be playable on any Xbox One console — there will be no regional restrictions.
Well…we will have to see if they /do/ change it. I still have no hope for the Xbox one.
(via endersands)
I apologize in advance to anyone who dies of cute overload or gets diabetes from watching this video. By pressing play you absolve me from any responsibility for what happens to you for watching this… Soooooo, I hope you will all enjoy Dash’s first time with fresh fruit cuz it is bloody adorable!
this shirt would fit if it weren’t for boobs: a tragedy
that shirt would fit if i had boobs: the sequel
this shirt fits perfectly because my boobs are the right size: the fanfiction
my shirts always fit: a man’s tale
My Shirts Always Fit (I Don’t Wear Shirts): A Romantic Comedy
(via thebookwormy)
Some random photos of Artemis and one of Rosie. I’m trying not to bug her too much so she can start putting some weight back on. She’s definitely eating normally again, at least! Artemis has also decided I’m the most amazing thing ever and follows me around in his cage and squeaks at me now. I have no clue where the hell that came from, but he’s always been weird. It is cute, though!
![kenobi-wan-obi:
thinksquad:
Discovered in 2007, this is the largest known void in the universe. More info: http://bit.ly/17CJxaA
I hate to be that guy but this is extremely false and misleading. If I’m not mistaken (please correct me if I’m wrong), this is actually Barnard 68. B68 is a dark nebula:
“Barnard 68 is a molecular cloud, dark absorption nebula or Bok globule, towards the southern constellation Ophiuchus and well within our own galaxy at a distance of about 500 light-years, so close that not a single star can be seen between it and the Sun. American astronomer Edward Emerson Barnard added this nebula to his catalog of dark nebulae in 1919. He published his catalog in 1927, at which stage it included some 350 objects. Because of its opacity, its interior is extremely cold, its temperature being about 16 K (−257 °C). Its mass is about twice that of the Sun and it measures about half a light-year across.” [source]
It’s actually a blob of dust collapsing on itself to eventually become a star in like 100,000 years.
This is simply a photoshopped version, whoever did this must have used the liquify tool to give the nebula’s figure a slightly different shape. But what caught my attention aside from that suspicious description was the fact that I remember what the brighter stars surrounding B68 look like.
This is B68:
See how similar it looks? down to the position of the closer stars most visible? The above pic is a sham :/ I love the mysteries of the Universes as much as the next person but there’s really no point in misleading stuff like this. Oh and p.s. the link provided above in the original post is a completely different article talking about a completely different occurrence.](http://25.media.tumblr.com/87c8f8bbaf10704e7460a371b62638a6/tumblr_mommhkAnIe1qk91wgo1_400.jpg)
Discovered in 2007, this is the largest known void in the universe. More info: http://bit.ly/17CJxaA
I hate to be that guy but this is extremely false and misleading. If I’m not mistaken (please correct me if I’m wrong), this is actually Barnard 68. B68 is a dark nebula:
“Barnard 68 is a molecular cloud, dark absorption nebula or Bok globule, towards the southern constellation Ophiuchus and well within our own galaxy at a distance of about 500 light-years, so close that not a single star can be seen between it and the Sun. American astronomer Edward Emerson Barnard added this nebula to his catalog of dark nebulae in 1919. He published his catalog in 1927, at which stage it included some 350 objects. Because of its opacity, its interior is extremely cold, its temperature being about 16 K (−257 °C). Its mass is about twice that of the Sun and it measures about half a light-year across.” [source]
It’s actually a blob of dust collapsing on itself to eventually become a star in like 100,000 years.
This is simply a photoshopped version, whoever did this must have used the liquify tool to give the nebula’s figure a slightly different shape. But what caught my attention aside from that suspicious description was the fact that I remember what the brighter stars surrounding B68 look like.
This is B68:
See how similar it looks? down to the position of the closer stars most visible? The above pic is a sham :/ I love the mysteries of the Universes as much as the next person but there’s really no point in misleading stuff like this. Oh and p.s. the link provided above in the original post is a completely different article talking about a completely different occurrence.
(via jadehariey)
